ROME "Its too bad about your
friend," Irans ambassador to Damascus nodded gravely. "He is innocent.
They are all innocent as individuals. It is a very unfortunate situation."The
friend was Terry Anderson. The speaker was Ali Akhbar Mohtashami, the man U.S.
intelligence claimed held the power of life and death, freedom or captivity, over Anderson
and his fellow hostages.
It was May 1985, and I had sought out Khomeinis man in Damascus to
hear Irans perspective on the terrorism plaguing the United States.
Intelligence sources claimed Mohtashami was the conduit for the Lebanese
terrorists money and weapons. The office where we sat was the place where many of
the attacks had been planned.
A leader of the revolt against the shah, the Iranian ambassador held a deep-seated
hatred of all things American. Visitors immediately saw one of the reasons why. His right
hand was a carefully crafted rubber fake. Several fingers from his left hand were also
missing. They had been blown off when the ambassador opened a bobby-trapped Koran that
arrived shortly after the U.S. Marine barracks bombing.
Mohtashami blamed the CIA for that and much more.
"Let me tell you clearly that I have had 20 years of struggle against the American
intervention in our countries," he replied when asked about his role in the violence.
Nor was he ready to abandon that struggle: "We think that as long as America as a
superpower looks to Israel in a special way and prefers it to all other countries, and
until the United States can be nonaligned in the Middle East, there will be
difficulties."
Mohtashami had just finished praising me for my interest in the Shiites views
when I pointed out the irony that Terry Anderson, a reporter who had written extensively
about the plight of the Shiites, was now their prisoner.
"Yes, it is too bad about your friend and the rest," Mohtashami repeated, his
black clerical robes rustling as he showed me to the door. "They are suffering for
the policy of your government, just as others will suffer until that policy changes."
By yesterday, Terry Anderson had been suffering for 1,460 days and
nights. Yesterday was his fourth anniversary in captivity.
He and the eight other Americans and half-dozen Europeans held with him are victims of
the Reagan Administrations blundering and naivete; victims of a policy that made
enemies of Lebanese Moslems who once looked to the United States with hope; victims of a
government that criticizes the PLO for attacks on Israeli occupation troops in Lebanon but
remains silent about Israeli bombing raids that injure schoolchildren.
Most of all, they are victims of an apathetic American public and a White House that
has tried hard to make the nation forget.
But they are also victims of an Iranian leadership and its Lebanese surrogates who vent
their anger against a handful of innocents who remained in Beirut to help.
"Let there be no hostility excerpt against wrongdoers," orders the Koran. Yet
a reporter who risks his life telling the Shiites story becomes a victim of their
wrath; a republic based on a religion that preaches compassion keeps innocent teachers
chained in isolation.
Terry Anderson is the longest-serving hostage. Each time a ray of hope for his release
appears it is quickly eclipsed: by Oliver Norths bungled arms-for-hostages exchange;
by the mistaken downing of the Iran Air passenger jet; and now by the Salman Rushdie
affair.
Just when it seemed that Iran might be ready to exchange the hostages
for renewed trade ties with the West, Tehran has lurched back toward isolation.
In the murky world of Irans internal politics, it is a victory for the radicals,
a victory most of all for Ali Akhbar Mohtashami. Today the man whose rubber hand daily
reinforces his hatred of America is Irans interior minister, leader of those who
remain determined to punish the United States.
Mohtashami has the power to demonstrate the compassion and justice of the religion he
serves as a high priest. Yet four years after speaking of the hostages innocence, he
appears no closer to intervening on their behalf. It is, indeed, "a very unfortunate
situation."